0 of 4 Questions completed
Questions:
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading…
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You must first complete the following:
0 of 4 Questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 point(s), (0)
Earned Point(s): 0 of 0, (0)
0 Essay(s) Pending (Possible Point(s): 0)
| Average score |
|
| Your score |
|
The allegations in this case were determined to be:
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) made an unannounced visit to deliver findings on allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
True or False:
LPAs interviewed all sources involved and information from client files was straightforward and clear.
During the course of this investigation, LPAs conducted interviews with pertinent sources but LPAs were unable to interview all sources involved. LPA reviewed client files. Information obtained was conflicting and vague. Information obtained from pertinent reports contained conflicting information regarding the allegation of sexual assault.
One allegation claimed that facility staff failed to protect a resident from being sexually assaulted by another resident. The second allegation was that facility staff took:
Allegations: Facility staff failed to protect resident from being sexually assaulted by other resident. Facility staff took resident’s funds. Licensing Program Analyst made an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegations.
True or False:
During the course of this investigation, LPAs interviewed all sources involved.
During the course of this investigation, LPAs conducted interviews with pertinent sources but LPAs were unable to interview all sources involved. LPA reviewed client files. Information obtained was conflicting and vague.
